Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham fired more attempts (22 vs 5 shots).
- AFC Wimbledon was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 45%).
- Rotherham held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 65%Lead | Pass accuracy | 51% |
| 238Lead | Accurate passes | 126 |
| 366Lead | Total passes | 248 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |