Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham created the clearer chances on xG (2.89 vs 1.02, Δ 1.87).
- Rotherham fired more attempts (16 vs 7 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 2.89Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.02 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 152 | Accurate passes | 224Lead |
| 253 | Total passes | 316Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Afc Wimbledon |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |