Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham created the clearer chances on xG (1.44 vs 1.32, Δ 0.12).
- Barnsley fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Barnsley was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 1.44Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.32 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 55% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 142 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 259 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Barnsley |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |