Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham created the clearer chances on xG (3.30 vs 1.34, Δ 1.96).
- Cardiff fired more attempts (20 vs 16 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 3.30Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.34 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 12 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 200 | Accurate passes | 477Lead |
| 258 | Total passes | 542Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Cardiff |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.