Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham fired more attempts (22 vs 10 shots).
- Charlton was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 9Lead | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 54% | Pass accuracy | 61%Lead |
| 178 | Accurate passes | 183Lead |
| 332Lead | Total passes | 300 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Charlton |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.