Match statistics snapshot
- Huddersfield created the clearer chances on xG (0.51 vs 1.21, Δ 0.70).
- Huddersfield fired more attempts (18 vs 7 shots).
- Huddersfield was more accurate in front of goal (28% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 0.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 257Lead | Accurate passes | 233 |
| 335Lead | Total passes | 326 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Huddersfield |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |