Match statistics snapshot
- Hull City created the clearer chances on xG (0.56 vs 1.45, Δ 0.89).
- Hull City fired more attempts (20 vs 11 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.56 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.45Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 6 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 227 | Accurate passes | 398Lead |
| 329 | Total passes | 479Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Hull City |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.