Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham created the clearer chances on xG (1.27 vs 0.90, Δ 0.37).
- Ipswich fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 1.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.90 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 60% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 151 | Accurate passes | 520Lead |
| 253 | Total passes | 613Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Ipswich |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |