Match statistics snapshot
- Leeds created the clearer chances on xG (0.66 vs 1.64, Δ 0.98).
- Leeds fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 28%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 0.66 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.64Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 26% | Ball possession | 74%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 157 | Accurate passes | 653Lead |
| 241 | Total passes | 730Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Leeds |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |