Match statistics snapshot
- Mansfield Town fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Mansfield Town held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Mansfield Town |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
2 | OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | 1Lead |
3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
0 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
7 | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 13Lead |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Mansfield Town |
|---|---|---|
45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
68% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
239 | Accurate passes | 322Lead |
350 | Total passes | 431Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Mansfield Town |
|---|---|---|
3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Mansfield Town |
|---|---|---|
5 | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 5 |
3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Mansfield Town |
|---|---|---|
10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Rotherham leads shot accuracy (+24% vs Mansfield Town)
Rotherham leads shot accuracy (+24% vs Mansfield Town)
Mansfield Town leads box penetration (+26% vs Rotherham)
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Mansfield Town leads this block
Rotherham — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Rotherham — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Mansfield Town leads this block
Mansfield Town leads territorial pressure (+75% vs Rotherham)
Mansfield Town leads territorial pressure (+75% vs Rotherham)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Rotherham leads (14.0 vs 12.0).
Mansfield Town leads (41.3 vs 30.6).
Mansfield Town leads (13.0 vs 6.0).
Rotherham leads (17.0 vs 16.0).