Match statistics snapshot
- Middlesbrough created the clearer chances on xG (0.07 vs 1.28, Δ 1.21).
- Middlesbrough fired more attempts (20 vs 3 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| 0.07 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.28Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 187 | Accurate passes | 579Lead |
| 278 | Total passes | 668Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Middlesbrough |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |