Match statistics snapshot
- Millwall created the clearer chances on xG (0.90 vs 2.10, Δ 1.20).
- Millwall fired more attempts (21 vs 5 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (80% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Millwall |
|---|---|---|
| 0.90 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.10Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Millwall |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 56% | Pass accuracy | 71%Lead |
| 168 | Accurate passes | 280Lead |
| 299 | Total passes | 394Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Millwall |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Millwall |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Millwall |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |