Match statistics snapshot
- Port Vale created the clearer chances on xG (1.08 vs 2.14, Δ 1.06).
- Port Vale fired more attempts (18 vs 11 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 1.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.14Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 233 | Accurate passes | 281Lead |
| 343 | Total passes | 375Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Port Vale |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.