Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (24 vs 13 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 21%).
- Reading held more of the ball (74% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Offsides | ||
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 11Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 13Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 26% | Ball possession | 74%Lead |
| 56% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 114 | Accurate passes | 488Lead |
| 202 | Total passes | 581Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |