Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham fired more attempts (17 vs 12 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 6%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8 | Shots off target | 8 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
| 17Lead | Total shots | 12 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 69%Lead |
| 196 | Accurate passes | 213Lead |
| 300 | Total passes | 308Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 8 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |