Match statistics snapshot
- Reading fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Reading was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 5 |
| 4 | Shots on target |
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 63% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 169 | Accurate passes | 207Lead |
| 270 | Total passes | 289Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.