Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham fired more attempts (17 vs 10 shots).
- Rotherham was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 10%).
- Reading held more of the ball (53% possession).
Rotherham vs Reading
Attacking
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 7 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5 | Shots off target | 5 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
| 17Lead | Total shots | 10 |
Possession & passing
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 219 | Accurate passes | 250Lead |
| 295 | Total passes | 345Lead |
Set pieces
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Defensive & goalkeeping
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Discipline
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |