Match statistics snapshot
- Sheffield Wednesday created the clearer chances on xG (0.37 vs 1.48, Δ 1.11).
- Sheffield Wednesday fired more attempts (17 vs 7 shots).
- Sheffield Wednesday was more accurate in front of goal (24% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 0.37 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.48Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 3 | Shots off target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 243Lead | Accurate passes | 214 |
| 334Lead | Total passes | 313 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Sheffield Wednesday |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.