Match statistics snapshot
- Stoke City created the clearer chances on xG (0.21 vs 0.33, Δ 0.12).
- Stoke City fired more attempts (4 vs 3 shots).
- Stoke City was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 0.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.33Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 2Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 0 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 4Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 245 | Accurate passes | 422Lead |
| 358 | Total passes | 542Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Stoke City |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.