Match statistics snapshot
- Wycombe created the clearer chances on xG (1.38 vs 2.20, Δ 0.82).
- Rotherham fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 1.38 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.20Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 306 | Accurate passes | 341Lead |
| 417 | Total passes | 447Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rotherham | Statistic | Wycombe |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.