Match statistics snapshot
- Royal AM fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Ajax Cape Town was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Ajax Cape Town |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Ajax Cape Town |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 320Lead | Accurate passes | 288 |
| 415Lead | Total passes | 374 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Ajax Cape Town |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Ajax Cape Town |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Ajax Cape Town |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.