Match statistics snapshot
- Amazulu fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Royal AM was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 22%).
- Royal AM held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 398Lead | Accurate passes | 292 |
| 467Lead | Total passes | 373 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Amazulu |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.