Match statistics snapshot
- Royal AM fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Royal AM was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 13%).
- Cape Town City held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 67% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 187 | Accurate passes | 370Lead |
| 279 | Total passes | 454Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.