Match statistics snapshot
- Royal AM fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Royal AM was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- Cape Town City held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 2 |
| 2 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 267 | Accurate passes | 351Lead |
| 363 | Total passes | 430Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Cape Town City |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.