Match statistics snapshot
- Polokwane City fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Royal AM was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Polokwane City |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Polokwane City |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 278 | Accurate passes | 314Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 395Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Polokwane City |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Polokwane City |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Polokwane City |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.