Match statistics snapshot
- Richards Bay fired more attempts (12 vs 7 shots).
- Royal AM was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 42%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 73%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 303Lead | Accurate passes | 297 |
| 417Lead | Total passes | 413 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Richards Bay |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.