Match statistics snapshot
- TS Galaxy fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- TS Galaxy was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
- Royal AM held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Ts Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 3 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 5 |
| 5 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Ts Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 344Lead | Accurate passes | 266 |
| 412Lead | Total passes | 338 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Ts Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Ts Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 1Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Royal Am | Statistic | Ts Galaxy |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.