Match statistics snapshot
- Rubin created the clearer chances on xG (1.99 vs 1.05, Δ 0.94).
- Dynamo fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Rubin was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rubin | Statistic | Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.05 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rubin | Statistic | Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 372Lead | Accurate passes | 244 |
| 457Lead | Total passes | 338 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rubin | Statistic | Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rubin | Statistic | Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rubin | Statistic | Dynamo |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |