Match statistics snapshot
- FC Orenburg fired more attempts (14 vs 5 shots).
- FC Orenburg was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 20%).
- Rubin held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rubin | Statistic | Fc Orenburg |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rubin | Statistic | Fc Orenburg |
|---|---|---|
| 58%Lead | Ball possession | 42% |
| 75%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 322Lead | Accurate passes | 197 |
| 428Lead | Total passes | 291 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rubin | Statistic | Fc Orenburg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rubin | Statistic | Fc Orenburg |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rubin | Statistic | Fc Orenburg |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |