Match statistics snapshot
- FC Orenburg fired more attempts (13 vs 10 shots).
- FC Orenburg was more accurate in front of goal (23% on target vs 10%).
- Rubin held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rubin | Statistic | Fc Orenburg |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 4 |
| 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rubin | Statistic | Fc Orenburg |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 306Lead | Accurate passes | 169 |
| 414Lead | Total passes | 265 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rubin | Statistic | Fc Orenburg |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rubin | Statistic | Fc Orenburg |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rubin | Statistic | Fc Orenburg |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |