Match statistics snapshot
- Rubio NU created the clearer chances on xG (1.14 vs 0.51, Δ 0.63).
- Rubio NU fired more attempts (12 vs 5 shots).
- 2 de Mayo was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rubio Nu | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.14Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rubio Nu | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 78%Lead |
| 245 | Accurate passes | 284Lead |
| 323 | Total passes | 365Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rubio Nu | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rubio Nu | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rubio Nu | Statistic | 2 De Mayo |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.