Match statistics snapshot
- Rubio NU created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 1.03, Δ 0.84).
- Cerro Porteno fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- Cerro Porteno was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rubio Nu | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.03 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rubio Nu | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 185 | Accurate passes | 337Lead |
| 257 | Total passes | 403Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rubio Nu | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rubio Nu | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rubio Nu | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |