Match statistics snapshot
- LNZ Cherkasy created the clearer chances on xG (0.51 vs 0.97, Δ 0.46).
- Ruh Lviv fired more attempts (10 vs 9 shots).
- LNZ Cherkasy was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ruh Lviv | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 0.51 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.97Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ruh Lviv | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 329Lead | Accurate passes | 276 |
| 404Lead | Total passes | 361 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ruh Lviv | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ruh Lviv | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ruh Lviv | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.