Match statistics snapshot
- Antwerp created the clearer chances on xG (0.27 vs 3.37, Δ 3.10).
- Antwerp fired more attempts (13 vs 2 shots).
- Antwerp was more accurate in front of goal (69% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 0.27 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.37Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 0 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 235 | Accurate passes | 575Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 646Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Antwerp |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.