Match statistics snapshot
- AS Eupen created the clearer chances on xG (0.32 vs 1.67, Δ 1.35).
- AS Eupen fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- AS Eupen was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rwdm | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 0.32 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.67Lead |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 6 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 11Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rwdm | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 72%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 286Lead | Accurate passes | 275 |
| 398Lead | Total passes | 395 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rwdm | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rwdm | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rwdm | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |