Match statistics snapshot
- RWDM created the clearer chances on xG (2.05 vs 1.70, Δ 0.35).
- Cercle Brugge fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- RWDM was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 2.05Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 60%Lead | Pass accuracy | 58% |
| 241Lead | Accurate passes | 193 |
| 399Lead | Total passes | 330 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Cercle Brugge |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.