Match statistics snapshot
- Charleroi created the clearer chances on xG (0.82 vs 1.79, Δ 0.97).
- RWDM fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Charleroi held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Charleroi |
|---|---|---|
| 0.82 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.79Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Charleroi |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 270 | Accurate passes | 424Lead |
| 369 | Total passes | 511Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Charleroi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Charleroi |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Charleroi |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |