Match statistics snapshot
- RWDM fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- RWDM was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 0%).
- Club Brugge II held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 4Lead |
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 527Lead |
| 334 | Total passes | 616Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Club Brugge Ii |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |