Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (0.60 vs 1.10, Δ 0.50).
- RWDM fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- RWDM held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.60 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 |
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 400Lead | Accurate passes | 334 |
| 494Lead | Total passes | 441 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.