Match statistics snapshot
- RWDM created the clearer chances on xG (1.74 vs 1.49, Δ 0.25).
- RWDM fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- RWDM was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.49 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 384Lead | Accurate passes | 354 |
| 452Lead | Total passes | 432 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Rwdm | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.