Match statistics snapshot
- Sabah FA fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Sabah FA was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 27%).
- Sabah FA held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Sabah Fa | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| Shots inside the box | ||
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| Shots outside the box |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Sabah Fa | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Sabah Fa | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Sabah Fa | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Sabah Fa | Statistic | Rīgas Fs |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 5 |