Match statistics snapshot
- Salford City created the clearer chances on xG (1.57 vs 0.32, Δ 1.25).
- Salford City fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Salford City was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Salford City | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 1.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.32 |
| 5 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 2Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Salford City | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 50% | Pass accuracy | 63%Lead |
| 144 | Accurate passes | 265Lead |
| 286 | Total passes | 419Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Salford City | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Salford City | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Salford City | Statistic | Barnet |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |