Match statistics snapshot
- Barrow created the clearer chances on xG (1.16 vs 1.44, Δ 0.28).
- Salford City was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Salford City | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 1.16 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44Lead |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 3 |
| 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Salford City | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 61% | Pass accuracy | 61% |
| 199 | Accurate passes | 206Lead |
| 326 | Total passes | 336Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Salford City | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Salford City | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Salford City | Statistic | Barrow |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 8 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |