Match statistics snapshot
- Salford City created the clearer chances on xG (0.87 vs 0.18, Δ 0.69).
- Salford City fired more attempts (12 vs 5 shots).
- Salford City was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Salford City | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 0.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.18 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Salford City | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 56% |
| 298Lead | Accurate passes | 144 |
| 403Lead | Total passes | 259 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Salford City | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Salford City | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Salford City | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 22 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.