Match statistics snapshot
- Rotherham created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 1.72, Δ 0.22).
- Salford City fired more attempts (17 vs 14 shots).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Salford City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.72Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 5 | Shots off target |
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Salford City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 72% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 226 | Accurate passes | 226 |
| 313Lead | Total passes | 307 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Salford City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Salford City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Salford City | Statistic | Rotherham |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.