Match statistics snapshot
- San Diego created the clearer chances on xG (1.47 vs 0.45, Δ 1.02).
- San Diego fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Nashville SC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Diego | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.45 |
| Offsides | ||
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Diego | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 548Lead | Accurate passes | 353 |
| 619Lead | Total passes | 426 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Diego | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Diego | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 0.74 | Goals prevented | 0.74 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Diego | Statistic | Nashville Sc |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.