Match statistics snapshot
- San Diego created the clearer chances on xG (2.13 vs 0.96, Δ 1.17).
- San Diego fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- San Diego was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Diego | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 2.13Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.96 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Diego | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 495Lead | Accurate passes | 215 |
| 577Lead | Total passes | 287 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Diego | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Diego | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| -1.16 | Goals prevented | -1.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Diego | Statistic | Portland Timbers |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 16Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |