Match statistics snapshot
- Racing Louisville W fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- San Diego Wave W was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 27%).
- San Diego Wave W held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Diego Wave W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Diego Wave W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 416Lead | Accurate passes | 285 |
| 503Lead | Total passes | 356 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Diego Wave W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Diego Wave W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Diego Wave W | Statistic | Racing Louisville W |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |