Match statistics snapshot
- San Jose Earthquakes created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 1.10, Δ 0.09).
- San Jose Earthquakes fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- San Jose Earthquakes was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.10 |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 265 | Accurate passes | 354Lead |
| 341 | Total passes | 438Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| -0.10 | Goals prevented | -0.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Chicago Fire |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.