Match statistics snapshot
- FC Cincinnati fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- FC Cincinnati was more accurate in front of goal (25% on target vs 9%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
| 1 |
| 3Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 372Lead | Accurate passes | 326 |
| 448Lead | Total passes | 405 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| San Jose Earthquakes | Statistic | Fc Cincinnati |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.